Tue, 07/09/2019 - 10:33

Most organizations want their people to be inspired, focused on dealing with reality as it is, pro-active and happy,  but few achieve it over time.  Whether you call it motivation, engagement, high performance  or whatever…,  there are all kinds of supposed solutions but few that provide much benefit.  One piece of the puzzle lies in basing your actions on validated data that underlies these factors- what employees expect and their natural tendencies related to what motivates and activates them.

The following video discussion overviews a new capability and one we've found highly effective for the following:

  1. Understanding the underlying causal factors of organizational culture.
  2. Developing targeted action plans for individuals and the organization to improve performance including engagement,  satisfaction and pro-active inspired behavior.
  3. Screening for teams and hiring.
  4. Providing valuable insight for hiring and management especially in relating expectations, natural tendencies and fulfillment on the factors,  important if not essential, to the individual.

 

Sat, 06/01/2019 - 08:03

How do you identify potentially damaging behaviors that impact your job performance and personal productivity?  As a leader, how do you work with your team to improve their performance?   How do you identify a new understanding and a pathway to corrective action or at least improvement?  A validated behavioral assessment that  measures the full spectrum of suitability and emotional intelligence factors that underlie our behavior can have some great benefits.  It's a key element if you want to optimize your talent decision support capabilities.  In the article below, Dr. Dan Harrison, developer of the Harrison Assessment gives some examples.

Wed, 02/20/2019 - 09:48

Augmented reality allows you to create an experience that immerses a learner or decision maker with visual "information" to be more effective.   How might you augment reality to support individual hiring decisions?   Augmented Reality typically combines data,  images, sound, movies, databases, social media, and the web and expands them digitally to facilitate more effective learning and decision-making.     A key issue with a hiring type decision is bias and many of these options, if not done carefully, would actually increase bias.   What's missing from many conventional and non-conventional hiring and selection processes is the job-relevant baseline information which allows you to compare and contrast candidates.  This baseline information would also facilitate other media entering into the decision process without producing bias. 

Mon, 02/11/2019 - 13:12

Benchmarking your jobs so you can make better people decisions and understand best how to achieve high performance is not a simple task; however with some assists from technology, it is now an efficient high payback process.  Lead consultant, Alan Hoffmanner explains in the following video how best to go about this...

Mon, 01/28/2019 - 00:09

Have you ever made a bad hiring decision?

  • Hired the wrong person for a job
  • Chose the wrong person for a team or project
  • Invested in training new salespeople or reps, only to find that they achieved poor results when it came time to get to work (Knowledge is not necessarily power unless accompanied by the right capabilities).

Unfortunately, making bad people decisions is not uncommon due to the way most companies manage their talent acquisition processes.  For a couple decades repeated studies have shown the exorbitant cost to these mistakes typically centering around 3 times the annual salary or between one hundred and two hundred thousand dollars each time. Many of the costs are hidden in the short term but they are still there.  Some of the factors that contribute to this include:

  • Lying on resumes and exaggerating skill sets are prevalent - studies have indicated over 80% of resumes contain at least one significant lie.
  • Impressive credentials can create bias relating to overall qualifications or real weaknesses.
  • Most candidates have prepared well to sell themselves and it's not that hard to "perform" for 60 minutes but that performance may have little to do with actual job performance.
  • Background checks are not designed to uncover reveal character flaws
  • Often candidates with horrible track records but some good short term "performances" in interviews can get chosen. One key reason
  • For the last decade, most U.S. employers advise their employees to avoid true negative feedback  during a reference check due to litigation concerns. Reference checks serve a role but a very minor one.

To ensure your search results in a high performer, most would agree, you need an objective assessment of the candidates ability to be a high performer.  High performance is a function of a number of things including natural tendencies, motivational factors, task factors, decision styles, interests, tolerances,  work preferences, other patterns of behavior (i.e. interpersonal factors) and for many higher level jobs, leadership effectiveness factors.    All of these things can be measured accurately, related to the behavior of high, average and low performers in a similar job and used through a scientific assessment to determine whether a person will have a high or low probability of being a high performer.

Fri, 01/11/2019 - 12:48

Automation of work processes (whether through AI and machine learning and/or through physical robots) will replace many lower skilled workers but the jobs created will more than offset these.   The key caveat is that these jobs will require the workers to excel at teamwork, adaptability and complex problem solving.   The latter certainly involves some cognitive and quantitative problem solving but all three involve a heavy dose of social/interpersonal and personal effectiveness goals since so much of the problem solving will involve not just data from machines but input from people - customers, managers, colleagues, suppliers…  These conclusions are based on studies sponsored by the World Bank and another by Mckinsey & Company, both in the last quarter of 2018.

Having a baseline understanding of the behavioral tendencies and the suitability of candidates and employees will increase in importance as time passes based on these issues.   Understanding individual behavioral tendencies and promoting the development self-awareness of the issues underlying emotional intelligence and behavioral tendencies is already a proven strategy with demonstrable benefits- these benefits can be expected to increase measurably over the coming years.

Wed, 10/24/2018 - 12:25

The War for Talent has been talked about since the early 2000's but with the recession and slow growth, many industries didn't even perceive it,  but heading into 2020, I think most will agree it is pervasive and real. 

Causes include a combination of several factors including the following:

  • Cultural factors which lead many away from STEM careers, 
  • The precipitous decline, over the last few decades, in the quality of education especially secondary education dropping from the best to below most developed countries,
  • The accelerated retirements of baby boomers and
  • Other demographic issues.

Newer technology which enable better choices in talent management help but they don’t' fix the supply problem.  Having said that, there is a new realization occurring at many organizations we deal with,  that there needs to be more aggressive strategies and tactics to deal with the what will be an ongoing supply challenge for quality labor whether it's senior management or the lowest levels in the organization. 

Fri, 07/20/2018 - 13:55

In part one, we discussed 5 of the pitfalls that impact talent decisions. Here we'll discuss 3 more and draw some overall conclusions.

Failure to detect deception:  We tend to like or favor those who are like us and other proven biases often prevent us detecting that we are being deceived.  Good preparation,  good storytelling, sociability,  good acting - all are things that can accentuate bias and prevent detection from being detected. Most importantly,  for the most part, good interviewing doesn't necessarily mean good performance on the job.

Over-reliance on intuition:  Intuition is a good thing when used properly but when your experience base with the person is very small and the scope of data limited-- it results in highly biased and ineffective decisions

Thu, 07/05/2018 - 13:24

Shortages for quality people, rather than being highly variable, are now affecting nearly every industry and type of worker with few exceptions.  From our experience in talking with dozens of HR/Talent organizations across the US each week, in figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and in a number of articles in the Wall Street Journal in the last 3 months, like today's article,  In this job market, Quitters are Winning,   the talent shortage  (and from another perspective, Talent War) is here and here to stay.

Pages

"The U.S. Department of Labor has estimated the costs to replace an employee to be approximately 1/3 their annual salary; but when you start looking at the impact of hiring the wrong employee and having to replace them, some studies say 2.5 times annual earnings, some 4 times and some even higher." AGILEdge