Tue, 03/29/2022 - 01:17

When organizations make people decisions, it is most common to see a process full of bias, assumptions, expediency and rather ineffective results.

It does not need to be nor should it be that way. 

The main decision inputs end up often coming from impressions and assumptions rather than through a process of validating information and making an effective group decision.  This is why a comprehensive Baseline is needed to support these decisions.  In this video discussion, we overview and generalize a bit on how a people decision process (hiring, promotion, team, project, development program choice…) might work when you have a comprehensive informational baseli

ne to validate and update as the process moves forward.  Companies often have parts of this (or think they do because some of it is in their IT system or the capability is there  OR they believe their recruiters do this -  think again!)  but the key elements that especially answer the question, will they do the job as a high performer?  are missing.

Wed, 09/22/2021 - 14:40

Many organizations invest in team building events where games are played and discussions facilitated but little is actually accomplished to address fundamental improvements in how the team functions.   Many of these approaches are actually effective AFTER a proven method for improving self and team awareness is executed, but this is not common.  

In most leadership teams, many  think they are great communicators, conflict resolvers,  influencers, problem-solvers,    empathizers,  decision makers, coaches and on and on.  And, yes in each team,  some have these strengths  and some clearly don't and often they don't realize it. This overall lack of self awareness causes people to feature, and often lead with their weaknesses, which causes new problems, more conflict, lack of trust,  lack of buy-in - all, of which, have repercussions throughout the organization. The root cause of many of the team issues is simply a lack of self awareness which is really a sign that there is poor actionable understanding of each other.

Fri, 02/12/2021 - 11:59

Has the nature of what makes leaders effective changed?  Given the new dynamics of volatity, unpredictabilty, diversity in many forms, technology and globalization (and likely other factors), what is the impact on leadership?  We believe many of the fundamentals haven't changed but that there are also new fundamentals.  Many of these center around identifying and managing (or navigating) paradox and we see this as a necessary set of skills going forward.  The purpose of this video is to begin a discussion on these.  Your thoughts?

Fri, 10/02/2020 - 10:08

Now a few months into the forced remote work environment, most organizations now believe their day to day execution productivity has improved - some dramatically. Many are making plans for long term remote work environments.  We are seeing greater challenges is in the longer term planning and strategic activities where mixed results are reported. Some organizations need to reach a better balance in how and what they communicate -  it's clear some are actually over doing it and that it is having an impact on leadership effectiveness. Others have grown tired of the communications aspect and have the opposite problem.  

Tue, 09/01/2020 - 11:17

Here we continue, somewhat belatedly with part 2 of our discussion on assisting others in reaching their full potential  with validated behavioral data. Here, in part 2, we discuss how the coaching manager is prepared for explaining the behavioral suitability data  to the  assessee.    Specifically  three areas are discussed:

  • The necessity of understanding and communicating their strongest traits and strongest aversions 
  • The importance of authenticating the data and measuring data reliability and an overall description of the types of data used to understand and impact behaviors. 
  • The importance of using accurate data that aligns with human nature - that includes both/and scenarios made possible by the use of paradoxes.  Personality typing tools based on how they collect data only provide either/or data which leads to inaccuracies.

 

Mon, 06/15/2020 - 08:54

Today, I want to draw your attention to a short discussion of some key elements of being a leader in a volatile unpredictable time - being an Agile Leader.  Necessarily this requires being able to distinguish between simple, complicated and complex decisions and the ability to use the appropriate process and style for each (or suffer very negative consequences.   In this discussion, Trish Gorman of Columbia Business School summarizes her list of the 6 traits of an agile leader.   One additional point that I would suggest, is to broaden the "awareness" attribute to include self and team as it is the foundation. Of course, we are biased as this is the core of our practice.

Tue, 06/02/2020 - 13:01

Using accurate behavioral suitability data that lays out one's motivations, tendencies, attitudes and behavioral competencies greatly increases management effectiveness when used properly.  Unfortunately, when we discuss this with many, they think about their efforts to use personality typing data, trying to find value in D or I or E or N "types".   In fact, using "types" can often make the understanding of the person even murkier for a variety of reasons, but focusing on actual traits where the trait's intensity is accurate and where negative traits are also measured, provides a much more powerful method for improving management interactions. In this 2 part series, our aim is to give you some perspective for how a manager  can use this to improve their leadership and additionally to provide an overview of the data that is used.  This is part 1 of 2.

Fri, 05/22/2020 - 13:08

Back in 2003, we started a new process with executive teams who had just been through debriefs on their behavioral assessments focusing on both their  leadership, interpersonal and personal effectiveness behaviors and how effective they are in initiating, motivating, implementing and maintaining in each area.  We found that even after positive even emotional experiences improving their self-awareness and better understanding their causal factors underlying their behavior,  a few weeks later,  many reverted back to previous behaviors  with little benefit.   We hypothesized that if they had to share their perceptions of others and then share their actual behavioral tendencies (assessment scores), they would internalize it more.

Tue, 04/28/2020 - 07:29

Hungry- a bag of potato chips is worth a lot,  if you just got out of a big dinner at Morton's or Ruth Chris,  there is little or no marginal benefit. In organizations, if you have a highly disorganized and unfocused hiring process, there is a huge benefit to simply implementing some basic systems for managing candidates, planning your talent and structuring your interview process.  On the other hand,  many organizations, especially those that have not had a hiring push recently,  will not be fully conscious of their lack of basic processes or systems for this purpose. Others almost conversely, will take their conscious observation of this and invest in a fix-all IT system that often brings with it a whole new set of problems.

When you implement a decision support system based on job specific research and you take the time to understand the candidates fit with the job and culture, the marginal benefit is almost always very large- whether your talent processes are mature or rather undeveloped, however the nature of the benefits is considerably different in these scenarios.

Let's take the scenario of implementing a talent decision support system that consists of the following:

Decision Support system  that provides the following:

Pages

"The U.S. Department of Labor has estimated the costs to replace an employee to be approximately 1/3 their annual salary; but when you start looking at the impact of hiring the wrong employee and having to replace them, some studies say 2.5 times annual earnings, some 4 times and some even higher." AGILEdge